Deadline: Legal Blog-It would be surprising if Trump wins his Epstein lawsuit against Murdoch and WSJ
Last edited Fri Jul 25, 2025, 11:45 AM - Edit history (1)
Its unclear how the president would pass the demanding test for public figure plaintiffs in defamation cases or how hed win big bucks in the process.
It would be surprising if Trump wins his Epstein lawsuit against Murdoch and WSJ
Itâs unclear how the president would pass the demanding test for public figure plaintiffs in defamation cases or how heâd win big bucks in the process. www.msnbc.com/deadline-whi...
— News Wire - World ð Independent News Network Pro-Democracy (@democracyblue.bsky.social) 2025-07-22T13:10:38.750Z
https://www.msnbc.com/deadline-white-house/deadline-legal-blog/wall-street-journal-trump-epstein-lawsuit-rcna219968
According to the article:
The letter bearing Trumps name, which was reviewed by the Journal, is bawdylike others in the album. It contains several lines of typewritten text framed by the outline of a naked woman, which appears to be hand-drawn with a heavy marker. A pair of small arcs denotes the womans breasts, and the future presidents signature is a squiggly Donald below her waist, mimicking pubic hair. The letter concludes: Happy Birthday and may every day be another wonderful secret.
.....The presidents civil complaint was filed in Florida federal court against Dow Jones & Company Inc., which publishes the Journal; News Corp., which owns Dow Jones; Murdoch, director and majority owner of News Corp.; News Corp. CEO Robert Thomson; and the Journal reporters on the story, Khadeeja Safdar and Joseph Palazzolo.
One reason why Trumps suit faces an uphill battle:
He would have to clear the high legal bar for plaintiffs who are public figures. Known as the actual malice standard, it requires plaintiffs to show that defendants knew the information they published was false or recklessly disregarded the truth.
On that note, Trumps complaint alleges that the civil defendants
possessed information and had access to information that showed their statements were false, and that they published with knowledge of the falsity of the statements, and/or with reckless disregard of their truth or falsity......
Barring some truly surprising revelation about a professional outlet like the Journals conduct in reporting on and publishing the article,
the prospect of discovery alone almost makes it hard to see Trump pressing the case that far. Does he want to produce oath-bound testimony about his relationship with Epstein that would fuel more news stories and put that relationship on front pages and social media feeds?.....
True, the president has secured monetary settlements from media organizations in cases that didnt necessarily seem to warrant them. But a Dow Jones spokesperson said they have full confidence in the rigor and accuracy of our reporting, and will vigorously defend against any lawsuit, so this one might not be headed down that sort of path.