General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsJosh Marshall: People should be mounting primary campaigns against pretty much every Democrat who is in a safe seat
The first is obvious. To the extent Democrats are weakened by their reputation for not effectively fighting Trump, they should be taking every opportunity to do that now. Yes, this is kind of obvious. But give me a moment and Ill connect it to a point I think makes the meaning more clear. They should take every opportunity to fight and draw attention to unpopular things. They shouldnt be worried about the downsides of opposing a president who now routinely has 55% of the population in opposition him.
Second, the campaign message is obvious and is the one every successful midterm opposition makes. Put a check on Trumps illegal, out-of-control, violent, stupid policies. Theres no check on him. Put a check on him. This is the ultimate dont overcomplicate it. People are really, really opposed to the stuff Trump is doing now. Say youll rein him in. The catch, though, is that to make that credible you really need to show that youre maxing out the limited power congressional Democrats currently have. So fighting harder and more effectively today doesnt just address damage to the Democratic brand its essential to underpin the best campaign strategy and message.
Third, people should be mounting primary campaigns against pretty much every Democrat who is in a safe seat. The greatest attention is on a few right-leaning Dems whove managed to win in Trump districts. Thats stupid. Democrats need those seats. But in safe seats, run primaries. Im not saying everyone needs to go, but everyone needs to be put to some test. To deal with the Trump crisis you need caucuses made up only of wartime consiglieres. So make way for one or become one. I remain convinced this is not mainly about ideology, its about whos willing to fight and who isnt. Thats my prescription.
https://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/how-is-it-going-for-the-democrats

Passages
(3,645 posts)It's different out there, and to be fair, not necessarily suited for everyone.
For some, it might be a time to reflect, perhaps pass it on to someone else.
brush
(61,033 posts)in the midterm elections. Unseating incumbent Dems who have proven they cant kick rethug ass in the general election for an unproven rookie...not smart at all.
The rethugs have a very thin majority and as unpopular as trump and his deportations and tariffs are, we just have to bide our time, no unwise incumpent challenges, and we unseat Johnson, win the House majority and stifle trump's agenda for the rest of his sorry term.
Period.
TheProle
(3,737 posts)For philosophical recalibration and an opportunity for an infusion of fresh ideas and talent.
Keepthesoulalive
(1,853 posts)We cannot afford to lose fighters . This may look good for a wrestling match but I would hate to lose Jasmine, Al Green, Alexandria and a lot of other good people because some folks want drama.
B.See
(6,810 posts)threatening/campaigning against "safe" Democrats.
(insert sarcasm thingy here)
Arazi
(8,394 posts)Cant have any new fresh ideas or youre not a good Dem! Besides, Josh has never run for office or anything so hes irrelevant!
Doesnt matter TPM is a Democratic supporting media outlet. In fact, time to be mad that you have a Dem supportive organization that you make money with!
Chuck him outta here amiright?!11?!
🙄
travelingthrulife
(3,370 posts)Arazi
(8,394 posts)How is that designed to lose?
People are hungry for Dems that are going to the mat and recent fundraising demonstrates that.
"Donations from individualsas opposed to those from political-action committeesmade up 99% of Ocasio-Cortezs fundraising this year. That is the highest proportion of any House incumbent running in 2026."
"Mamdani is a study in the power of small-dollar donations. While his average contribution has been the smallest of any of the mayoral candidates, according to New York City Campaign Finance Board data, he has still managed to be competitive in fundraising because he has had so many more donors"
"The .4 million [AOC] has collected makes her the biggest House fundraiser this year, nearly doubling the total of the chamberâs most powerful member, House Speaker Mike Johnson (R., La.)."
— George Pearkes (@peark.es) 2025-07-24T12:29:59.368Z
carpetbagger
(5,377 posts)That's not the job of the DNC. That's the opposite of their job, which is to support party infrastructure and nominees. Hogg just saw it as a big microphone and lacked the experience to understand how organizations work.
And I'm not dissing reformers and progressives. Howard Dean was the best DNC Chair since Robert Strauss, and the insider-establishment chairs repeatedly fail the party.
Arazi
(8,394 posts)In some cases, those people are being excoriated for all sorts of bullshit reasons in an attempt to take them down.
Cant wait to hear about a virtual Dem elder statesman like Josh Marshall and TPM getting similarly thrown under the bus.
Fact remains active fighting progressives (like AOC) are getting showered with small donor cash because a lot of people want fighters. Dem establishment types ignore that at our peril
carpetbagger
(5,377 posts)When I talk about Hogg doing a poor job and choosing a poor job for his agenda, it's a one-off. I'm excited by the primary progressive challenges. Unfortunately, I think it'll be a long time for this to happen.
dsc
(53,166 posts)due to not spending any money on it. That alone cost us the US House in 2024. But yes let's set piles of money on fire in primaries.