Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

erronis

(20,655 posts)
Sat Jul 19, 2025, 02:30 PM Saturday

Musk's Neuralink falsified federal forms, claims to qualify for racial diversity program

https://popular.info/p/musks-neuralink-falsified-federal
Caleb Ecarma

The company, owned by the world's wealthiest man, says it is a "small disadvantaged business"

On April 24, Elon Musk's $9 billion neurotechnology company falsely self-certified as a "small disadvantaged business" (SDB) on a federal filing, a designation that qualifies the company for preferential treatment as part of a racial and ethnic diversity initiative.

The SDB designation can also only be legally claimed by companies owned by "economically disadvantaged individuals."

Neuralink, which is developing implantable brain-computer interfaces, registered with the government as an SDB while Musk leveraged his position at the White House to cut federal funding for diversity, equity, and inclusion programs.

. . .

Neuralink's misrepresentation is particularly notable, given Musk's past condemnations of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs aimed at helping members of historically disadvantaged groups. "DEI is just another word for racism," Musk said in January of this year. "Shame on anyone who uses it," he added. Musk has also described DEI as "actually illegal."

While leading the Department of Government Efficiency, the Trump administration's austerity program, Musk claimed that he was ferreting out and terminating federal DEI initiatives. DOGE, under Musk's guidance, focused on purging federal DEI grants and contracts for minority owned businesses, including legitimate SDBs.

In May, after Neuralink secured $600 million in fresh funding, the company had a $9 billion before-cash valuation, according to Semafor.


Muskrat: "Whoopsie. I made a small mistake. Never happens....."
1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Musk's Neuralink falsified federal forms, claims to qualify for racial diversity program (Original Post) erronis Saturday OP
Lawyers and definitions of terms will matter for this Renew Deal Saturday #1

Renew Deal

(84,273 posts)
1. Lawyers and definitions of terms will matter for this
Sat Jul 19, 2025, 02:42 PM
Saturday

And the posted section of the article does not prove anything. For example, this statement is just one criteria. They don’t allege it was used. “The SDB designation can also only be legally claimed by companies owned by "economically disadvantaged individuals”

If the criteria is that the business is owned by “African Americans” or people born outside the US, it may qualify.

I don’t dismiss the hypocrisy, but the article doesn’t prove anything.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Musk's Neuralink falsifie...