Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

orleans

(35,922 posts)
Tue Apr 22, 2025, 05:04 PM Tuesday

WTF??? "White House Assesses Ways to Persuade Women to Have More Children" nytimes

White House Assesses Ways to Persuade Women to Have More Children
Baby bonuses and menstrual cycle classes are among the ideas pitched to Trump aides as they consider plans to try boosting the birthrate.




By Caroline Kitchener
Caroline Kitchener writes about the American family.
April 21, 2025

The White House has been hearing out a chorus of ideas in recent weeks for persuading Americans to get married and have more children, an early sign that the Trump administration will embrace a new cultural agenda pushed by many of its allies on the right to reverse declining birthrates and push conservative family values.

One proposal shared with aides would reserve 30 percent of scholarships for the Fulbright program, the prestigious, government-backed international fellowship, for applicants who are married or have children.

Another would give a $5,000 cash “baby bonus” to every American mother after delivery.

A third calls on the government to fund programs that educate women on their menstrual cycles — in part so they can better understand when they are ovulating and able to conceive.





oh yeah, there's more to this insane fucking idea...

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/04/21/us/politics/trump-birthrate-proposals.html

no paywall, archive link: https://archive.is/0RQky

read on... if you dare....
12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
WTF??? "White House Assesses Ways to Persuade Women to Have More Children" nytimes (Original Post) orleans Tuesday OP
nope nope nope SARose Tuesday #1
I'll spell it out for the perpetually clueless NYT senseandsensibility Tuesday #2
The unspoken part, I'd wager... Mister Ed Tuesday #3
A Sexy Calendar might work lame54 Tuesday #4
Musk orangecrush Tuesday #5
The best way is to create a world in which people feel confident about their futures. tanyev Tuesday #6
Women was put on earth for child bearing and............ Lovie777 Tuesday #7
Like 5 grand is going to change anyone's mind.😂😂😂 Phoenix61 Tuesday #8
How are they going to filter out all the non-white women? Twisted Sick Fuck Nictuku Tuesday #9
I recently listened to a podcast by someone who wrote a book about "natalism" tishaLA Tuesday #10
Great just what no one needs 😣 Meowmee Tuesday #11
An old friend of mine eventually had 13 kids with his wife. Xolodno Tuesday #12

senseandsensibility

(21,715 posts)
2. I'll spell it out for the perpetually clueless NYT
Tue Apr 22, 2025, 05:09 PM
Tuesday

It's none of their business. Oh, and stop the sanewashing. Everyone sees through it now.

Mister Ed

(6,571 posts)
3. The unspoken part, I'd wager...
Tue Apr 22, 2025, 05:09 PM
Tuesday

...is that this would be a program designed to persuade white women to have more children.

tanyev

(46,160 posts)
6. The best way is to create a world in which people feel confident about their futures.
Tue Apr 22, 2025, 06:11 PM
Tuesday

In other words, the exact opposite of what they’re doing.

tishaLA

(14,614 posts)
10. I recently listened to a podcast by someone who wrote a book about "natalism"
Tue Apr 22, 2025, 06:56 PM
Tuesday

....and he was in favor of it, but he also said that no program has ever managed to increase birth rates. So of course the administration will invest time and resources into this while cutting Medicaid.

Xolodno

(6,961 posts)
12. An old friend of mine eventually had 13 kids with his wife.
Tue Apr 22, 2025, 07:49 PM
Tuesday

After the 4th one he secured sponsorship and moved to Australia, so basically, the state picks up the tab for the most part. You wan that here? The wealthy will have to pony up in taxes to support food, medical, school, clothing, etc. benefits. Otherwise, its DOA.

Side note, joked to another friend after his 8th, "should we both chip in and send him a pallet condoms?".

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»WTF??? "White House Asses...