Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDeadline: Legal Blog-Sarah Palin loses defamation retrial against New York Times
The former Alaska governor and Republican vice presidential nominee had won a retrial over a 2017 editorial.
Link to tweet
https://www.msnbc.com/deadline-white-house/deadline-legal-blog/sarah-palin-new-york-times-verdict-jury-trial-defamation-case-rcna202362
Former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin lost her defamation retrial against The New York Times over a 2017 editorial she said damaged her reputation, Reuters reported on Tuesday.
The federal jury found the media company not liable after deliberating for about two hours.
Palin, a former Republican vice presidential nominee, lost a previous trial in 2022 against the media company but won a new one due to several major issues in the case, as a federal appellate panel put it last year.
Palins lawsuit stemmed from an editorial called Americas Lethal Politics, which compared two political shootings: the 2011 killing of six people and the injury of 13 others in Arizona, including then-Rep. Gabrielle Giffords, a Democrat; and the 2017 Virginia shooting that seriously injured four people, including Rep. Steve Scalise, R-La., at a congressional baseball game practice.
The Times editorial argued there was a clear and direct link between the Arizona shooting and the political incitement arising from a digital graphic published in March 2010 by Palins political action committee. The graphic was a map that superimposed crosshairs over 20 congressional districts represented by Democrats, including Giffords.
But a relationship between the crosshairs map and the shooting was never established, as the appeals court wrote last year, adding that the incident was rather viewed as a tragic result of the shooters serious mental illness. (A correction on the editorial currently reads: An editorial on Thursday about the shooting of Representative Steve Scalise incorrectly stated that a link existed between political rhetoric and the 2011 shooting of Representative Gabby Giffords. In fact, no such link was established. The editorial also incorrectly described a map distributed by a political action committee before that shooting. It depicted electoral districts, not individual Democratic lawmakers, beneath stylized cross hairs.)
The Times said in a statement after the appellate ruling last year, This decision is disappointing. Were confident we will prevail in a retrial.
This is a developing story. Check back for updates.
The federal jury found the media company not liable after deliberating for about two hours.
Palin, a former Republican vice presidential nominee, lost a previous trial in 2022 against the media company but won a new one due to several major issues in the case, as a federal appellate panel put it last year.
Palins lawsuit stemmed from an editorial called Americas Lethal Politics, which compared two political shootings: the 2011 killing of six people and the injury of 13 others in Arizona, including then-Rep. Gabrielle Giffords, a Democrat; and the 2017 Virginia shooting that seriously injured four people, including Rep. Steve Scalise, R-La., at a congressional baseball game practice.
The Times editorial argued there was a clear and direct link between the Arizona shooting and the political incitement arising from a digital graphic published in March 2010 by Palins political action committee. The graphic was a map that superimposed crosshairs over 20 congressional districts represented by Democrats, including Giffords.
But a relationship between the crosshairs map and the shooting was never established, as the appeals court wrote last year, adding that the incident was rather viewed as a tragic result of the shooters serious mental illness. (A correction on the editorial currently reads: An editorial on Thursday about the shooting of Representative Steve Scalise incorrectly stated that a link existed between political rhetoric and the 2011 shooting of Representative Gabby Giffords. In fact, no such link was established. The editorial also incorrectly described a map distributed by a political action committee before that shooting. It depicted electoral districts, not individual Democratic lawmakers, beneath stylized cross hairs.)
The Times said in a statement after the appellate ruling last year, This decision is disappointing. Were confident we will prevail in a retrial.
This is a developing story. Check back for updates.
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Deadline: Legal Blog-Sarah Palin loses defamation retrial against New York Times (Original Post)
LetMyPeopleVote
Tuesday
OP
SWBTATTReg
(25,182 posts)1. I hope that the NYT sues her for their legal fees, and more.
tanyev
(46,160 posts)2. Hey, Sarah, if you want to see a boost in your ratings, go after Elon for constantly using the R word.
Remember how much that offended you a few years ago???
LetMyPeopleVote
(161,908 posts)3. Well that was fast
It did not take long for the jury to find against Palin. Given that the first hour of deliberations involved things like picking a foreman and reading instructions, this was indeed fast
Link to tweet

LetMyPeopleVote
(161,908 posts)4. This made me smile

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(121,904 posts)5. Too bad, so sad

UTUSN
(73,902 posts)6. K&R for, Hip hip hooray!!!@!