Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

HoneyBadger

(2,297 posts)

1. The way that it is done now, you are right

Reply to UCmeNdc (Original post)

Thu Dec 22, 2016, 05:44 PM

Dec 2016

But fraud could be greatly reduced by using multiple factor authentication, similar to password reset on an ATM card. Yes, there are a few people that this would not work for. And guess what, they will tend to be rural red staters.

For instance, a swipe card and a temporary password that is sent to your phone with a 10 minute window to enter it. And a confirmation text with your vote details.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

4 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

You do understand that it is impossible to accurately recount the vote？ [View all] UCmeNdc Dec 2016 OP

The way that it is done now, you are right HoneyBadger Dec 2016 #1

You are correct but the GOP does not want accurate verifiable voting in the US UCmeNdc Dec 2016 #2

yes; we need all paper ballots, all hand-counted, all the time. it's not that hard. nt TheFrenchRazor Dec 2016 #3

Depends on the state. MineralMan Dec 2016 #4