Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

drray23

(8,306 posts)

2. none of these state laws regarding "faithless electors" has been challenged.

Reply to Jose Garcia (Original post)

Mon Dec 19, 2016, 03:10 PM

Dec 2016

There are questions about whether or not these state laws are even constitutional. That has not been tested at the supreme court yet because we never were in a situation where this could arise.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

4 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Minnesota doesn't f**k around with with faithless electors [View all] Jose Garcia Dec 2016 OP

Is that good or bad? HassleCat Dec 2016 #1

none of these state laws regarding "faithless electors" has been challenged. drray23 Dec 2016 #2

MN cast 10 votes for Hillary uppityperson Dec 2016 #3

Good.. She's the one who was out there on Cha Dec 2016 #4