Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

HassleCat

(6,409 posts)

2. Maine and Nebraska

Reply to The Sushi Bandit (Original post)

Thu Dec 8, 2016, 03:42 PM

Dec 2016

Proportional representation vs. winner take all. The court's would be hesitant to open that can of worms because it might open things up for minority parties and coalition governments.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

10 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Hillary Clinton could have legal right to challenge electoral college system [View all] The Sushi Bandit Dec 2016 OP

The electoral college is part of the Constitution, it is by definition Constitutional Amishman Dec 2016 #1

Other parts of the Constitution can override the Electoral College. Equal justice. Coyotl Dec 2016 #4

Presumably the argument is that the Electoral College violates the Equal Protection Clause Jim Lane Dec 2016 #5

Maine and Nebraska HassleCat Dec 2016 #2

you are conflating assigning EV's per congressional district with actual proportional representation Grey Lemercier Dec 2016 #7

That's the way it is now. HassleCat Dec 2016 #9

K&R red dog 1 Dec 2016 #3

Maybe she could, but she won't. I'd just about stake my life on it. Crunchy Frog Dec 2016 #6

She's not even challenging the Michigan vote totals, which by accounts reported had a huge amount... dmosh42 Dec 2016 #8

Please someone actually read sarisataka Dec 2016 #10