Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

DanTex

(20,709 posts)

10. Probably because it would have gone nowhere, and Obama wanted to get ACA passed.

Reply to sarisataka (Reply #9)

Thu Dec 1, 2016, 11:13 PM

Dec 2016

Priorities. I agree that an open public debate would be good. But the reality is, it's not going to change, so I can't blame the Dems for focusing on things that they were doable.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

11 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Seriously folks, [View all] sarisataka Dec 2016 OP

K and r. nt cwydro Dec 2016 #1

A little research confirmed my memory... sarisataka Dec 2016 #2

People forget how much power the States had early on. Called the "United States" for a reason. jmg257 Dec 2016 #3

It is forgotten that in addition to one person, one vote sarisataka Dec 2016 #4

I believe it was even more restrictive than white males BigBadDem Dec 2016 #6

Isn't this what is mostly going on? NCTraveler Dec 2016 #5

No, what is going on is sarisataka Dec 2016 #8

I haven't seen an argument against this being made. NCTraveler Dec 2016 #11

It's not "whining". The EC is dumb and undemocratic. DanTex Dec 2016 #7

Why didn't we start an Amendment sarisataka Dec 2016 #9

Probably because it would have gone nowhere, and Obama wanted to get ACA passed. DanTex Dec 2016 #10