Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Little Tich

(6,171 posts)
13. The EUMC definition was dropped for the obvious reason that it included things
Sun Dec 11, 2016, 10:22 AM
Dec 2016

that were not anti-Semitic in the definition.

EU drops its ‘working definition’ of anti-Semitism

Source: Times of Israel, December 5, 2013

Fundamental Rights Agency had previously defined the term to include the vilification of Israel or Israelis

Read more: http://www.timesofisrael.com/eu-drops-its-working-definition-of-anti-semitism/

I think that anti-Semitism should keep on being considered a form of racism, and that no Newspeak definitions that include criticism of countries or political ideologies as anti-Semitism should be allowed.

It's very fortunate that some Congress critters have gotten cold feet about the bill, and I hope that if the bill will ever be reintroduced, it won't include anything about Israel. Kenneth Stern thoroughly botched his work on the definition, and he should pass the torch to someone who has better knowledge about the subject.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Israel/Palestine»Anti-Semitism Awareness B...»Reply #13